4.6 Article

Agricultural Water Utilization Efficiency in China: Evaluation, Spatial Differences, and Related Factors

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14050684

Keywords

agricultural water utilization efficiency; spatial differences; related factors; super-efficiency slacks-based measure; exploratory spatial data analysis; Geodetector

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72004124, 71704097]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that agricultural water utilization efficiency in China is low, with significant spatial differences between different regions. Agricultural technology is the main factor affecting agricultural water utilization efficiency.
Agricultural water utilization efficiency (AWUE) reflects the rational utilization of water resources in agricultural production. Improving AWUE is important for both improving the levels of agricultural production and reducing consumption of water resources, and it is significant to explore the spatial differences between different cities and regions and the various factors related to AWUE, both theoretically and practically. The AWUE of totally 281 cities at the prefecture level or above in China between 2003 and 2018 was evaluated using the super-efficiency slacks-based measure (SBM). The spatial differences in AWUE were simulated by exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA), and the various factors affecting AWUE were simulated using the graphical statistical tool, Geodetector. The results of this study are as follows: (1) The mean value of AWUE across the country was merely 0.23 when it registered a record high in 2018, indicating that the AWUE in China was low; (2) AWUE showed significant spatial differences judging from the results of ESDA, and the low-low type was the principal spatial type, which was distributed mainly in the North China Plain and the Loess Plateau; and (3) agricultural technology was the main factor affecting AWUE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available