4.6 Article

The Effects of Algaecides and Herbicides on a Nuisance Microcystis wesenbergii-Dominated Bloom

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14111739

Keywords

cyanobacteria; Microcystis; harmful algal blooms; management; treatment

Funding

  1. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation (AERF)
  2. USDA-NIFA Hatch Project [FLA-FTL-00565697]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested the effectiveness of different concentrations and combinations of algaecides and herbicides on Microcystis wesenbergii-dominated bloom. The results showed that a combination of SeClear and Hydrothol 191 with GreenClean Liquid 5.0 was the most effective, significantly reducing the abundance of the cyanobacterial bloom.
Microcystis-dominated cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) are a reoccurring problem globally, resulting in widespread economic and health impacts. As public awareness of the risks of blooms increases, there is an urgent need for studies on both short-term and long-term management of cyanoHABs. In order to provide science-based best management practices and treatment options, we tested various concentrations and combinations of USEPA-registered algaecides and herbicides on a Microcystis wesenbergii-dominated bloom. The bloom material was exposed to fifteen different algaecides, herbicides, or combinations, using four different concentrations. Cell abundance and morphology as well as microscopic analyses were undertaken at the time of collection and 72 h post-treatment. Overall, the effectiveness of the chemicals varied with the most efficacious treatments being SeClear (R), and a combination of Hydrothol (R) 191 and GreenClean (R) Liquid 5.0, both of which resulted in a significant decrease at all tested concentrations after 72 h. Interestingly, Microcystis wesenbergii is more resistant to algaecides than M. aeruginosa. Results from this study provide valuable data for treating cyanoHABs and show the varied efficacy of different algaecidal formulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available