4.6 Article

The WHO Guidelines for Safe Wastewater Use in Agriculture: A Review of Implementation Challenges and Possible Solutions in the Global South

Journal

WATER
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14060864

Keywords

risk awareness; behaviour change; food safety; social marketing; WHO guidelines; wastewater irrigation

Funding

  1. British Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. CGIAR Trust Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Globally, the use of untreated or partly treated wastewater in agriculture exceeds the use of well-treated wastewater. Despite significant investments in treatment, this gap may have increased due to factors such as population growth. To reduce health risks, the WHO suggests a broader concept emphasizing the importance of risk-reducing practices, especially for low-income countries, which presents challenges in shifting focus from technical solutions to human behavior change.
Globally, the use of untreated, often diluted, or partly treated wastewater in agriculture covers about 30 million ha, far exceeding the area under the planned use of well-treated (reclaimed) wastewater which has been estimated in this paper at around 1.0 million ha. This gap has likely increased over the last decade despite significant investments in treatment capacities, due to the even larger increases in population, water consumption, and wastewater generation. To minimize the human health risks from unsafe wastewater irrigation, the WHO's related 2006 guidelines suggest a broader concept than the previous (1989) edition by emphasizing, especially for low-income countries, the importance of risk-reducing practices from 'farm to fork'. This shift from relying on technical solutions to facilitating and monitoring human behaviour change is, however, challenging. Another challenge concerns local capacities for quantitative risk assessment and the determination of a risk reduction target. Being aware of these challenges, the WHO has invested in a sanitation safety planning manual which has helped to operationalize the rather academic 2006 guidelines, but without addressing key questions, e.g., on how to trigger, support, and sustain the expected behaviour change, as training alone is unlikely to increase the adoption of health-related practices. This review summarizes the perceived challenges and suggests several considerations for further editions or national adaptations of the WHO guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available