4.7 Article

Mapping Forest Aboveground Biomass Using Multisource Remotely Sensed Data

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14051115

Keywords

forest aboveground biomass; random forest; optical remote sensing; LiDAR; RaDAR

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX17AE69G]
  2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  3. NSF Growing Convergence Research Grant [NSF 2021086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The majority of the aboveground biomass on the Earth's land surface is stored in forests. However, accurate estimation of forest aboveground biomass (FAGB) remains challenging. This study proposed a new conceptual model using remotely sensed data to map FAGB. The model includes height metrics as the most important variables for estimating FAGB.
The majority of the aboveground biomass on the Earth's land surface is stored in forests. Thus, forest biomass plays a critical role in the global carbon cycle. Yet accurate estimate of forest aboveground biomass (FAGB) remains elusive. This study proposed a new conceptual model to map FAGB using remotely sensed data from multiple sensors. The conceptual model, which provides guidance for selecting remotely sensed data, is based on the principle of estimating FAGB on the ground using allometry, which needs species, diameter at breast height (DBH), and tree height as inputs. Based on the conceptual model, we used multiseasonal Landsat images to provide information about species composition for the forests in the study area, LiDAR data for canopy height, and the image texture and image texture ratio at two spatial resolutions for tree crown size, which is related to DBH. Moreover, we added RaDAR data to provide canopy volume information to the model. All the data layers were fed to a Random Forest (RF) regression model. The study was carried out in eastern North Carolina. We used biomass from the USFS Forest Inventory and Analysis plots to train and test the model performance. The best model achieved an R-2 of 0.625 with a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 18.8 Mg/ha (47.6%) with the out-of-bag samples at 30 x 30 m spatial resolution. The top five most important variables include the 95th, 85th, 75th, and 50th percentile heights of the LiDAR points and their standard deviations of 85th heights. Numerous features from multiseasonal Sentinel-1 C-Band SAR, multiseasonal Landsat 8 imagery along with image texture features from very high-resolution imagery were selected. But the importance of the height metrics dwarfed all other variables. More tests of the conceptual model in places with a broader range of biomass and more diverse species composition are needed to evaluate the importance of other input variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available