4.7 Article

miR-145, targeting high-mobility group A2, is a powerful predictor of patient outcome in ovarian carcinoma

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 356, Issue 2, Pages 937-945

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.011

Keywords

MicroRNA-145; HMGA2; Ovarian carcinoma; Prognosis; Survival

Categories

Funding

  1. Korean Government [NRF-2012-R1A1B3004095]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A1B3004095] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNA-145 (miR-145) expression is downregulated in several human cancers, but its clinical and functional relevance to ovarian carcinoma has not yet been elucidated. This study addressed the hypothesis that miR-145 serves as a prognostic biomarker and a tumor suppressor that regulates the expression of high-mobility group A2 (HMGA2) oncoprotein in ovarian cancer. Here, we found that low miR-145 expression and HMGA2 overexpression determined by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry significantly correlated with advanced stage, lymph node involvement, and distant metastasis in 74 ovarian carcinomas. Low miR-145 expression significantly correlated with tumor recurrence and worse overall survival (HR=8.62, P= 0.039). Transfection of pre-miR-145 resulted in reduced cell growth and migration, and increased apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells by TUNEL, colony forming, and cell migration assays. MiR-145 was found to directly target HMGA2 by luciferase assay and Western blotting. Our findings suggest that miR-145 functions as a tumor suppressor in ovarian cancer and directly targets HMGA2 oncoprotein. Low miR-145 and high HMGA2 expressions are potential biomarkers of poor prognosis of ovarian carcinoma and miR-145 is the more powerful predictor of patient outcome. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available