4.7 Article

Structural Behavior of a Composite Curtain Wall Fabricated by the Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing Method

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14071431

Keywords

FDM 3D printer; ABS-M30; cement cladding; harmony search algorithm; FEM

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIT) [NRF-2021R1A5A1032433, NRF-2020R1A2C3005687]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new type of 3D-printed curtain wall structure that uses a high-strength polymer panel for internal reinforcement, aiming to reduce production costs. The optimal model is selected through shape design and analysis, and the deformation of the structure is compared through testing at different wind speeds.
In this era of the fourth industrial revolution, the integration of big data and 3D printing technology with the construction industry has maximized productivity. Currently, there is an active effort to research the optimal cladding structure through 3D printing technology to reduce production costs. This paper proposes a new type of 3D print curtain wall, using a high-strength ABS-M30 polymer panel, which is stronger than the standard acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) polymer, as an internally reinforced structure. This structure is fabricated via fused deposition modeling, a 3D printing method, to reduce the weight of the general cement panel. In addition, the shape of the polymer board was designed; three shapes were considered-O, W, and X types-which aided in further reducing the weight of the cladding. After comparing the center deformation of the structure through a lateral load test and finite element method analysis, the optimal model was selected. The measured data of the two methods at a design wind speed of 100% showed a difference of approximately 10%; however, at 150% of the design wind speed, the difference between the two sets of data increased to 27%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available