4.7 Article

Extraction, Biochemical Characterization, and Health Effects of Native and Degraded Fucoidans from Sargassum crispifolium

Journal

POLYMERS
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14091812

Keywords

antioxidant; cytokine; immunostimulant; fucoidan; Fourier transform infrared; Sargassum crispifolium

Funding

  1. Yuan's General Hospital, Taiwan [YUAN-IACR22-01]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 110-2221-E-992-011, MOST 109-2314-B-214-004]
  3. Ministry of Education, Taiwan [MOE-RSC-108RSN0005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a native crude fucoidan (Ex) was extracted from Sargassum crispifolium and two degraded fucoidans, ExAh and ExHp, were obtained. ExHp showed the highest antioxidant activity and ExAh exhibited the maximum immune promoting effects. These fucoidans could potentially be used as effective antioxidants and immunostimulant agents, which are significant in the development of food and nutraceutical products.
In the current investigation, a native crude fucoidan (Ex) was extracted from Sargassum crispifolium, pretreated by single-screw extrusion, and two degraded fucoidans, i.e., ExAh (degradation of Ex by ascorbic acid) and ExHp (degradation of Ex by hydrogen peroxide), were obtained. The extrusion pretreatment increased the extraction yield of fucoidan by approximately 1.73-fold as compared to the non-extruded sample. Among Ex, ExAh, and ExHp, their molecular weight and chemical compositions varied, but the structural features were similar. ExHp possessed the greatest antioxidant activities among the extracted fucoidans. According to the outcome, ExAh exhibited the maximum immune promoting effects via enhanced NO, TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-10 secretion. Thus, both ExHp and ExAh may potentially be used as an effective antioxidant and as immunostimulant agents, which could be of great value in the development of food and nutraceutical products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available