4.6 Article

Filling gaps in bacterial catabolic pathways with computation and high-throughput genetics

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010156

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ENIGMA- Ecosystems and Networks Integrated with Genes
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological & Environmental Research [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To discover novel catabolic enzymes and transporters, the researchers combined high-throughput genetic data from 29 bacteria with an automated tool. They used GapMind to annotate the uptake and catabolism of compounds in bacterial and archaeal genomes, and systematically examined the gaps in predicted pathways. They identified new pathways or enzymes for the utilization of various compounds and annotated numerous enzymes and transporters.
To discover novel catabolic enzymes and transporters, we combined high-throughput genetic data from 29 bacteria with an automated tool to find gaps in their catabolic pathways. GapMind for carbon sources automatically annotates the uptake and catabolism of 62 compounds in bacterial and archaeal genomes. For the compounds that are utilized by the 29 bacteria, we systematically examined the gaps in GapMind's predicted pathways, and we used the mutant fitness data to find additional genes that were involved in their utilization. We identified novel pathways or enzymes for the utilization of glucosamine, citrulline, myo-inositol, lactose, and phenylacetate, and we annotated 299 diverged enzymes and transporters. We also curated 125 proteins from published reports. For the 29 bacteria with genetic data, GapMind finds high-confidence paths for 85% of utilized carbon sources. In diverse bacteria and archaea, 38% of utilized carbon sources have high-confidence paths, which was improved from 27% by incorporating the fitness-based annotations and our curation. GapMind for carbon sources is available as a web server () and takes just 30 seconds for the typical genome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available