4.6 Article

Local chromatin context regulates the genetic requirements of the heterochromatin spreading reaction

Journal

PLOS GENETICS
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010201

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1DP2GM123484, 1R35GM141888, HEALTH-2010-257082]
  2. National Science Foundation (Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences)
  3. New Frontier Award from the Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research
  4. Sandler Family foundation
  5. ARCS foundation scholarship
  6. Hooper Graduate Fellowship from the UCSF Department of Microbiology and Immunology
  7. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships [P30 DK063720]
  8. Heisenberg Program Fellow [1650113]
  9. Network of Excellence EpiGeneSys [BR3511/5-1]
  10. European Commission) and the Collaborative Research Center 1064
  11. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
  12. UCSF Diabetes Center
  13. UC Davis Genome Center which is partially support by a National Institutes of Health shared instrumentation [1S10OD010786-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the spreading process of heterochromatin and identifies specific genes that promote or antagonize this process. It also shows that different genes are required for spreading from different seeding sites. These findings have potential implications for cell fate specification and highlight the importance of understanding the mechanisms underlying the spread of epigenetic silencing along chromatin.
Author summaryRepressive structures, or heterochromatin, are seeded at specific genome sequences and then spread to silence nearby chromosomal regions. While much is known about the factors that seed heterochromatin, the genetic requirements for spreading are less clear. We devised a fission yeast single-cell method to examine how gene silencing is propagated by the heterochromatin spreading process specifically. Here we use this platform to ask if specific genes are required for the spreading process and whether the same or different genes direct spreading from different chromosomal seeding sites. We find a significant number of genes that specifically promote or antagonize the heterochromatin spreading process. However, different genes are required to enact spreading from different seeding sites. These results have potential implications for cell fate specification, where genes are newly silenced by heterochromatin spreading from diverse chromosomal sites. In a central finding, we show that the Clr6 protein complex, which removes chromatin marks linked to active genes, associates with the Forkhead 2 transcription factor to promote spreading of silencing structures from seeding sites at numerous chromosomal loci. In contrast, we show that proteins that remodel chromatin antagonize the spreading of gene silencing. Heterochromatin spreading, the expansion of repressive chromatin structure from sequence-specific nucleation sites, is critical for stable gene silencing. Spreading re-establishes gene-poor constitutive heterochromatin across cell cycles but can also invade gene-rich euchromatin de novo to steer cell fate decisions. How chromatin context (i.e. euchromatic, heterochromatic) or different nucleation pathways influence heterochromatin spreading remains poorly understood. Previously, we developed a single-cell sensor in fission yeast that can separately record heterochromatic gene silencing at nucleation sequences and distal sites. Here we couple our quantitative assay to a genetic screen to identify genes encoding nuclear factors linked to the regulation of heterochromatin nucleation and the distal spreading of gene silencing. We find that mechanisms underlying gene silencing distal to a nucleation site differ by chromatin context. For example, Clr6 histone deacetylase complexes containing the Fkh2 transcription factor are specifically required for heterochromatin spreading at constitutive sites. Fkh2 recruits Clr6 to nucleation-distal chromatin sites in such contexts. In addition, we find that a number of chromatin remodeling complexes antagonize nucleation-distal gene silencing. Our results separate the regulation of heterochromatic gene silencing at nucleation versus distal sites and show that it is controlled by context-dependent mechanisms. The results of our genetic analysis constitute a broad community resource that will support further analysis of the mechanisms underlying the spread of epigenetic silencing along chromatin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available