4.6 Article

Understanding photosynthetic biofilm productivity and structure through 2D simulation

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009904

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ANR PhotoBiofilm Explorer [ANR-20-CE430008]
  2. ITN project Digitalgaesation (European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme) under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [955520]
  3. Treilles Foundation
  4. OPAL infrastructure from Universite Cote d'Azur
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [955520] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a spatial model for the growth of a photosynthetic microalgae biofilm and investigates the biofilm's structural dynamics and the impact of optimal harvesting strategies on its structure.
We present a spatial model describing the growth of a photosynthetic microalgae biofilm. In this 2D-model we consider photosynthesis, cell carbon accumulation, extracellular matrix excretion, and mortality. The rate of each of these mechanisms is given by kinetic laws regulated by light, nitrate, oxygen and inorganic carbon. The model is based on mixture theory and the behaviour of each component is defined on one hand by mass conservation, which takes into account biological features of the system, and on the other hand by conservation of momentum, which expresses the physical properties of the components. The model simulates the biofilm structural dynamics following an initial colonization phase. It shows that a 75 mu m thick active region drives the biofilm development. We then determine the optimal harvesting period and biofilm height which maximize productivity. Finally, different harvesting patterns are tested and their effect on biofilm structure are discussed. The optimal strategy differs whether the objective is to recover the total biofilm or just the algal biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available