4.0 Article

Comparison of Indices to Infer Population Dynamics of Black Brant

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 344-358

Publisher

U S FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE
DOI: 10.3996/JFWM-21-088

Keywords

age structure; Arctic; black brant; Branta bernicla nigricans; metapopulation; population dynamics; YukonKuskokwim Delta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the status of Pacific black brant by analyzing long-term data. The findings suggest a metapopulation structure exists for brant and highlight the fall age-partitioned Izembek Lagoon index as the best indicator for tracking population processes.
To aid managers in assessing status of Pacific black brant Branta bernicla nigricans (hereafter brant), I examined preexisting long-term data series from summer, fall staging, and wintering areas to infer overall population processes and assessed the utility of the various data sources. Variation in demographic parameters measured in subarctic and Arctic locations suggests some form of metapopulation structure likely exists for brant. I used serial autocorrelation coefficients to assess the ability of various indices to track population processes. Based on this approach, the Lincoln- Petersen estimator and the fall aerial survey estimate partitioned using age ratios of staging brant at Izembek Lagoon, Alaska, appear to be the best indicators. However, these two indexes show different trends for the overall brant population. The Lincoln-Petersen estimates showed biologically implausible changes in size among sequential years, whereas the fall Izembek index did not. Annual estimates of survival and productivity fit the patterns of annual variation in the fall Izembek index better than the Lincoln-Petersen estimates. I conclude that the fall age-partitioned Izembek Lagoon index appears to be the best for tracking population processes in brant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available