4.3 Article

PM2.5 Exposure and Health Risk Assessment Using Remote Sensing Data and GIS

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106154

Keywords

air pollution; PM2.5 exposure; health risk; geographic information systems; remote sensing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41730642, 41571047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a seasonal spatial-temporal modeling method to assess the relationship between exposure to PM2.5 air pollution and public health. The results indicate that PM2.5 pollution risks are most severe in spring and winter, with high-risk areas predominantly located in densely populated regions of the Shanghai-Hangzhou Bay area in China.
Assessing personal exposure risk from PM2.5 air pollution poses challenges due to the limited availability of high spatial resolution data for PM2.5 and population density. This study introduced a seasonal spatial-temporal method of modeling PM2.5 distribution characteristics at a 1-km grid level based on remote sensing data and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The high-accuracy population density data and the relative exposure risk model were used to assess the relationship between exposure to PM2.5 air pollution and public health. The results indicated that the spatial-temporal PM2.5 concentration could be simulated by MODIS images and GIS method and could provide high spatial resolution data sources for exposure risk assessment. PM2.5 air pollution risks were most serious in spring and winter, and high risks of environmental health hazards were mostly concentrated in densely populated areas in Shanghai-Hangzhou Bay, China. Policies to control the total population and pollution discharge need follow the principle of adaptation to local conditions in high-risk areas. Air quality maintenance and ecological maintenance should be carried out in low-risk areas to reduce exposure risk and improve environmental health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available