4.5 Article

Abundance leads to more species, particularly in complex habitats: a test of the increased population size hypotheses in bird communities

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 556-566

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jbi.12877

Keywords

birds; Cantabrian Mountains; climate; more-individuals hypothesis; niche breadth; niche position; rarefaction; richness; sampling effect

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [CGL2011-28177]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo examine the relationship between abundance and species richness in a bird community in order to (a) test the effects of sampling and three increased population size hypotheses and (b) assess the effects of energetic constraints (climate and habitat) on the relationship. LocationThe Cantabrian Mountains (c.16,000km(2)), Spain, within the temperate broadleaf and mixed forests biogeographical region. MethodsSpecies richness and individual abundances from a survey of 1106 10-min 100-m radius bird point counts spanning 5years were modelled with generalized additive models, controlling for habitat and climate. Individual-based rarefaction curves were built to facilitate the comparison among habitats. ResultsSpecies richness depended more on the number of individuals than on habitat or climate and increased with abundance along a nonlinear, strictly monotonic curve. The nature of this relationship varied with habitat type (contradicting sampling effect) and was not stronger for rarer species (contradicting the more-individuals hypothesis'). Community specialization and nestedness were related to climate constraints (supporting the niche-specialization hypotheses). Main conclusionsOur analyses strongly suggest that niche packing, particularly through niche breadth, determines the way that energy inputs translate into species richness, arguably through the abundance of individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available