4.3 Article

Participation of Nursing Students in Evidence-Based Practice Projects: Results of Two Focus Groups

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116784

Keywords

evidence; knowledge translation; learning; nursing; students

Funding

  1. Center for Research, Innovation, and Development in Nursing, in Portugal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the contributions of students' participation in knowledge translation projects to clinical practice and finds that successful implementation of evidence-based practice education can help students understand its importance and use it competently.
The development of true evidence-based practice requires that practitioners have the knowledge and skills to research, analyze, and use evidence. These skills must be acquired in pregraduate training. The objective of the present study was to analyze the contributions of students' participation in knowledge translation projects to clinical practice for evidence-based learning. This was a qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory study that used focus groups. Scripted interviews were administered. The design of the study included five phases and took place in the partnering institutions of the Safety Transition Project, involving fifteen participants. The study was authorized by the Research Ethics Committee. The data were analyzed following the steps encoding the categories, storage and recovery, and (3) interpretation and using computer software (WebQDA (R), Ludomedia, Aveiro, Portugal). Four categories were identified: learning evidence; communicating science; evidence-based practice; and developing skills. The successful implementation of evidence-based practice education resulted in students who understand its importance and use it competently. Further research should explore the skills developed by nurses involved in similar projects and their contribution to an EBP culture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available