4.3 Article

The Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies among HealthCareWorkers in University Hospital in Krakow before the Era of Vaccination

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074044

Keywords

seroprevalence; healthcare workers; COVID-19; infection prevention and control practices; work culture

Funding

  1. National Centre for Research and Development through the initiative Support for Specialist Hospitals in Fighting the Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and in Treating COVID-19 [SZPITALE-JEDNOIMIENNE/18/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in relation to demographic, social, and organizational factors at a university hospital. The results showed that the use of personal protective equipment did not significantly affect the testing results for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, while caring for COVID-19 patients significantly increased the risk of developing the disease. Not being aware of the COVID-19 status of healthcare workers posed a threat to other staff members, patients, and their family members and friends. Therefore, caution should be exercised when using respirators with exhalation valves during the pandemic.
Background: Knowledge of occupational health is crucial to the safety of healthcare workers in the pandemic period. The aim of our study was the rating of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in connection with selected demographic, social, and organizational factors, as well as the identification of key elements determining the safety of HCWs and patients of the University Hospital in Krakow. Methods: This was a non-interventional, uncontrolled, open, single-center, cross-sectional online survey on the preparedness for the COVID-19 epidemic and the seroprevalence of medical and non-medical HCWs and students. Serum specimens from 1221 persons were tested using an immunoassay analyzer based on the ECLIA technique for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies IgM + IgG. Results: The total seroprevalence was 42.7%. In medical students it was 25.2%, while in physicians it was 43.4% and in nurses/midwives it was 48.1%. Of those who tested positive, 21.5% did not know their serological status. The use of personal protective equipment did not have any significant impact on the result of testing for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The risk of developing the disease was not influenced by sex, professional work experience, workplace, or intensity of contact with the patient. Among the studied elements, only care of COVID-19 patients significantly increased the risk. The protective factor was starting work between the waves of the epidemic (June-September 2020). Conclusions: PPE is only one element of infection prevention and control-without other components, such as hand hygiene, it can be dangerous and contribute to self-infection. It is also very important to test healthcare workers. Not being aware of the COVID-19 status of HCWs poses a threat to other staff members, as well as patients and the family and friends of the infected. Thus, extreme caution should be applied when employing respirators with exhalation valves during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available