4.3 Review

Exercise Dose Equalization in High-Intensity Interval Training: A Scoping Review

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19094980

Keywords

training programs; physical activity; effort; patients; athletes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is becoming a popular trend in physical exercise worldwide compared to moderate continuous exercise (MICT). However, there is a methodological question regarding how to equalize exercise dose when comparing these two protocols. This scoping review found that there is no clear consensus on protocol equalization in the literature. Some prominent methods consider exercise dose in absolute values without considering the non-linear relationship with duration. Therefore, it is crucial to determine whether exercise dose should be quantified in absolute terms or relative to individual maximums when equalizing protocols.
Based on comparisons to moderate continuous exercise (MICT), high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is becoming a worldwide trend in physical exercise. This raises methodological questions related to equalization of exercise dose when comparing protocols. The present scoping review aims to identify in the literature the evidence for protocol equalization and the soundness of methods used for it. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for original investigations comparing the effects of HIIT to MICT. A total of 2041 articles were identified, and 169 were included. Of these, 98 articles equalized protocols by utilizing energy-based methods or exercise volume (58 and 31 articles, respectively). No clear consensus for protocol equalization appears to have evolved over recent years. Prominent equalization methods consider the exercise dose (i.e., energy expenditure/production or total volume) in absolute values without considering the nonlinear nature of its relationship with duration. Exercises resulting from these methods induced maximal exertion in HIIT but low exertion in MICT. A key question is, therefore, whether exercise doses are best considered in absolute terms or relative to individual exercise maximums. If protocol equalization is accepted as an essential methodological prerequisite, it is hypothesized that comparison of program effects would be more accurate if exercise was quantified relative to intensity-related maximums.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available