4.6 Article

Exploring vaccine hesitancy in care home employees in North West England: a qualitative study

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055239

Keywords

qualitative research; public health; COVID-19

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Barriers and mistrust exist among care home employees in receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and most employees do not support vaccination as a condition of deployment.
Objectives Care homes have experienced a high number of COVID-19 outbreaks, and it is therefore important for care home employees to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. However, there is high vaccine hesitancy among this group. We aimed to understand barriers and facilitators to getting the COVID-19 vaccine, as well as views on potential mandatory vaccination policies. Design Semi-structured interviews. Setting Care home employees in North West England. Interviews conducted in April 2021. Participants 10 care home employees (aged 25-61 years) in the North West, who had been invited to have, but not received the COVID-19 vaccine. Results We analysed the interviews using a framework analysis. Our analysis identified eight themes: perceived risk of COVID-19, effectiveness of the vaccine, concerns about the vaccine, mistrust in authorities, facilitators to getting the vaccine, views on mandatory vaccinations, negative experiences of care work during the COVID-19 pandemic, and communication challenges. Conclusions Making COVID-19 vaccination a condition of deployment may not result in increased willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccination, with most care home employees in this study favouring leaving their job rather than getting vaccinated. At a time when many care workers already had negative experiences during the pandemic due to perceived negative judgement from others and a perceived lack of support facing care home employees, policies that require vaccination as a condition of deployment were not positively received.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available