4.6 Article

Acceptability of family planning in a changing context in Uganda: a realist evaluation at two time points

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054277

Keywords

Reproductive medicine; Organisation of health services; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Funding

  1. Pfizer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlights the importance of social and cultural norms in influencing the acceptability of intervention measures. The background factors and mechanisms at different time points have an impact on the acceptability of modern contraceptive methods. The changes in the background have triggered mechanisms over time, leading to an increase in the acceptance of modern contraceptive methods.
Objectives This study sought to understand, during an intervention which integrated family planning (FP) and immunisation, (1) if and how prevailing contextual factors influenced acceptability and use of modern contraceptive methods (MCMs) in a pastoral community in Uganda, (2) what mechanisms were triggered by these contextual factors (3) if these contextual factors changed between two time points 2 years apart and (4) the impact of contextual changes on mechanisms triggered and acceptability and use outcomes. Design Qualitative realist evaluation over two time points. Setting Government health facilities in Moroto District, Karamoja, Uganda. Participants 69 participants involved in the delivery and uptake of integrated FP and childhood immunisation services. Intervention Integrated delivery of FP and childhood immunisation services offered to women accessing immunisation services in health facilities between January 2016 and December 2019. Results Four key themes were identified that encompassed context and mechanisms influencing acceptability of MCMs across both time points of the evaluation. These were: (1) fear of side effects of MCMs; (2) preference for natural FP methods; (3) pastoral lifestyles in the community and (4) food insecurity. The context of these themes changed over time leading to the triggering of mechanisms with an overall increase in acceptability of MCMs over time. Key mechanisms of acceptability triggered included: affective attitude, intervention coherence, self-efficacy, perceived effectiveness and opportunity cost, leading to the development of three context-acceptability theories. Conclusions In this study, social and cultural norms played a strong role in influencing acceptability of the intervention. The context combined with intervention components were found to trigger several mechanisms that mapped to constructs of diffusion of innovations and acted as catalysts for mechanisms of acceptability. The context in which the intervention was implemented changed leading to the triggering of mechanisms and an increase in the perceived value and acceptability of MCM use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available