4.7 Article

Engineering the Entrance of a Flavonoid Glycosyltransferase Promotes the Glycosylation of Etoposide Aglycone

Journal

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 1874-1880

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00032

Keywords

entrance; flavonoid glycosyltransferase; glycosylation; etoposide aglycone

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31570054, 21838002]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology Open Projects Fund [M2021-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study engineered the entrance of an enzyme to improve substrate recognition and enzymatic activity. By manipulating the positions of key residues and the size of the entrance, as well as hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions, the study successfully increased the affinity and conversion rate between the enzyme and substrate.
Enzyme entrances, which function as the first molecular filters, influencesubstrate selectivity and enzymatic activity. Because of low binding affinities, engineeringenzyme entrances that recognize non-natural substrates is a major challenge for artificialbiocatalyst design. Here, the entrance offlavonoid glycosyltransferase UGT78D2 wasengineered to promote the recognition of the aglycone of etoposide, a chemotherapeuticagent. We found that Q258, S446, R444, and R450, the key residues surrounding thesubstrate entrance, specifically guide theflux of etoposide aglycone, which has a highsteric hindrance, into the active site; this activity was inferred to be determined by theentrance size and hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Engineering thecoordination of Q258 and S446 to increase the entrance size and hydrophobicinteraction between UGT78D2 and etoposide aglycone increased the affinity by 10.10-fold and the conversion by 10%. The entrance-engineering strategy applied in this study can improve the design of artificial biocatalysts

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available