4.5 Article

Differential Effects of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Internus Deep Brain Stimulation on Motor Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages E245-E255

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.084

Keywords

GPi-DBS; Motor subtypes; No-medication MDS-UPDRS-III score; Parkinson's disease; STN-DBS

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81971070, 81671104, 81830033, 61761166004]
  2. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Ascent Plan [DFL20150503]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the differences in motor symptom change outcomes between bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in different motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease. The results showed that tremor-dominant type patients had a greater improvement compared to akinetic-rigid type patients, regardless of the stimulation target. Additionally, STN-DBS had better effects on motor symptoms for akinetic-rigid type patients compared to GPi-DBS.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the differences in motor symptom change outcomes after bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in well-defined motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease (PD) to improve clinical decision making. METHODS: We included 114 patients who had undergone STN-DBS and 65 patients who had undergone GPi-DBS. The patients were classified as having akinetic-rigid type (ART), tremor-dominant type (TDT), and mixed type (MT) using the preoperative Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS-III) scores in the no-medication state. The outcome measures included the no-medication MDS-UPDRS-III scores and subscore changes at the last follow-up after surgery. The outcomes were compared among the different motor subtypes and between STN-DBS and GPi-DBS. RESULTS: At the last follow-up (14.92 +/- 8.35 months), the TDT patients had had a greater median overall motor improvement in the no-medication MDS-UPDRS-III scores compared with the ART patients (62.90% vs. 46.67%; P < 0.001), regardless of the stimulation target. The ART patients showed greater improvement after STN-DBS than after GPi-DBS (54.44% vs. 37.21%; P < 0.001), with improvements in rigidity, akinesia, and posture and gait disorders accounting for the difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the different PD motor subtypes will have differential responses to STN-DBS and GPi-DBS, that TDT patients will experience greater improvement than ART patients, and that STN-DBS provides better effects for ART patients than does GPi-DBS. In addition, different motor symptoms among the different motor subtypes might respond differently to STN-DBS than to GPi-DBS. All these factors could reflect the heterogeneity of PD. Longer-term outcomes across the different motor subtypes and stimulation targets should be studied further.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available