4.5 Article

Radiological Analysis of Minimally Invasive Microscopic Laminectomy for Lumbar Canal Stenosis with a Focus on Multilevel Stenosis and Spondylolisthesis

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages E224-E234

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.079

Keywords

Green stick fracture method; Lumbar spinous process splitting laminectomy; Minimally invasive microscopic laminectomy; Multilevel disease; Spondylolisthesis; Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study retrospectively compared the radiological and clinical outcomes of two different surgical techniques (LSPSL and ULBD) for treating LCS. ULBD showed better outcomes in terms of recurrence prevention, preservation of the facet joints, and less blood loss.
OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively compared the radiological and clinical outcomes of two different surgical techniques (lumbar spinous process splitting laminectomy [LSPSL] and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression [ULBD]) to treat lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative study of 141 consecutive patients with an average age of 70.8 +/- 9.4 years who had undergone LSPSL or ULBD for LCS between April 2015 and April 2019. None of the patients had developed remote fractures of the spinous processes using either technique. These cases were divided into 2 groups: group L, 73 patients who had undergone LSPSL from April 2015 to April 2017; and group U, 68 patients who had undergone ULBD from May 2017 to April 2019. The clinical and radiological outcomes and surgical complications at the 1-year postoperative follow-up period were evaluated. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in the operative time between the 2 groups. However, group U had had significantly less blood loss than group L. The facet joints were significantly well preserved in group U. We examined the multilevel and spondylolisthesis cases separately and found that both surgical procedures were equally effective and that the visual analog scale scores for back or leg pain and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores had significantly improved postoperatively in each group. Group U showed better outcomes in terms of LCS recurrence, with 3 patients in the group L requiring repeat surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We found both ULBD and LSPSL to be safe and effective techniques for LCS, even for patients with spondylolisthesis and multilevel disease. ULBD was superior in terms of recurrence prevention, preservation of the facet joints, and less blood loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available