4.5 Article

Study of shear-thickening and shear-thinning behavior in rheology of self-compacting concrete with micro-nano bubble

Journal

STRUCTURAL CONCRETE
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 1920-1932

Publisher

ERNST & SOHN
DOI: 10.1002/suco.202100704

Keywords

micro-nano bubble; self-compacting concrete; shear thickening; shear thinning

Funding

  1. Department of Civil Engineering at Kharazmi University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigated the effect of using micro-nano bubbles and superplasticizers on the rheology of self-compacting concrete. The results showed that an increased rate of superplasticizer improved flowability and passing ability in all specimens. The samples made with micro-nano bubbles exhibited higher yield stress and plastic viscosity. Shear-thickening behavior was observed in samples produced with tap water and superplasticizer, while shear-thinning behavior was observed in SCC with micro-nano bubbles.
This research investigated the effect of using micro-nano bubbles and superplasticizers on the rheology of self-compacting concrete (SCC). Eight mix designs were made with different values of 4-5.5 kg/m(3) of superplasticizer. For comparison, half of the mix designs were made with micro-nano bubbles, and the rest were made with tap water. Flowability, passing ability, and rheological tests were performed on all mixed designs. The results show that an increased rate of superplasticizer from 4 to 5 kg/m(3) improved flowability and passing ability in all specimens. The yield stress and plastic viscosity of SCC reduction were higher in samples made with micro-nano bubbles. The shear-thickening behavior was observed in SCC samples produced with tap water and the superplasticizer, and the c/mu (positive) ratio increased. While in SCC with micro-nano bubbles, the shear-thinning behavior was observed, and the c/mu (negative) ratio increased with increasing the superplasticizer dose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available