4.0 Article

Disparities in Vision Impairment and Eye Diseases among Early Late-Life Women: The Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, Michigan Site

Journal

SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 7-8, Pages 887-894

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2072689

Keywords

Disparities; prevalence; vision impairment; women

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), DHHS, through the National Eye Institute [R21EY030363]
  2. National Institute of Aging [R01AG017104]
  3. University of Michigan MCubed
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH), DHHS, through the National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  5. National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
  6. NIH Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH) [U01NR004061, U01AG012505, U01AG012535, U01AG012531, U01AG012539, U01AG012546, U01AG012553, U01AG012554, U01AG012495, U19AG063720]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to measure the burden of vision impairment and ocular conditions in late-life women. The study found that black women and those with greater economic strain or less education had a higher prevalence of vision impairment. However, most participants were unaware of their ocular diagnosis. This highlights the need for increased vision services and access to optimal vision correction to reduce disparities across sociodemographic groups.
Objective: To quantify the burden of vision impairment (VI) and ocular conditions among early late-life women. Methods: Women (n = 254, mean age 66.0 years) participated in a comprehensive vision assessment. Visual acuity (VA) and ocular disorders (diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, hypertensive retinopathy, glaucoma and cataracts) were defined clinically. Race, economic strain and education were self-reported. Results: The prevalence of presenting VI (VA 20/40 or worse) was 11.0% and 75% of that was correctable (best-corrected VI 2.8%). Black women and those with greater economic strain or less education had a higher prevalence of presenting VI. These disparities were no longer present after considering best-corrected VI. Ocular disease prevalence ranged from 3.3% (age-related macular degeneration) to 30.2% (hypertensive retinopathy), but most participants were unaware of their ocular diagnosis. Conclusion: The discordance of presenting versus best-corrected VI and lack of knowledge of ocular conditions suggests a need for increased vision services. Access to optimal vision correction may attenuate differences across sociodemographic groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available