4.7 Article

Significance of borderline HbA2 levels in β thalassemia carrier screening

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09250-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology- Government of India
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased HbA(2) levels are typical in beta-thalassemia carriers, but some carriers have borderline HbA(2) levels. This study identified the determinants of borderline HbA(2) levels in 205 individuals and found that genetic factors play a role in this condition.
Increased HbA(2) levels are the characteristic feature of beta-thalassemia carriers. A subset of carriers however do not show HbA(2) levels in the typical carrier range (>= 4.0%) but show borderline HbA(2) levels. As a result, these carriers escape diagnosis and carry the risk of having beta-thalassemia major offspring. Borderline HbA(2) values may occur as a consequence of mild beta-thalassemia mutations, co-inherited beta-thalassemia and alpha- or delta- thalassemia or iron deficiency anemia. However, there is insufficient knowledge regarding the cause of borderline HbA(2) levels in specific populations. This study aimed to identify the determinants of borderline HbA(2) levels (which we have considered as HbA(2) 3.0-3.9%) in 205 individuals. Primary screening involved detecting the presence of iron deficiency anemia followed by molecular analysis of alpha, beta and delta globin genes. Remarkably, 168 of 205 individuals were positive for a defect. 87% (149/168) of positive individuals were heterozygous for beta thalassemia with (59/149) or without (90/149) the presence of co-existing IDA, alpha or delta gene defects. Notably, 20 of 149 beta thalassemia carriers showed HbA(2) < 3.5% and MCV > 80fL. 7 of these 20 carriers were married to carriers of hemoglobinopathies. Our findings describe the genetic basis of borderline HbA(2) levels and emphasize the necessity of a molecular diagnosis in these individuals in the routine clinical setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available