4.7 Article

Efficient double-layer sintering of titanomagnetite concentrate

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10405-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2017YFB0304301]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2021JJ40776]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University [202044016]
  4. Open Sharing Fund for the Large-scale Instruments and Equipments of Central South University [CSUZC202129]
  5. Basic Research Fund project of Zhongye Changtian International Engineering Co., Ltd. [2021JCYJ04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Double-layer sintering can improve the quality and yield of sintered ore by controlling the different basicity layers of the sintering bed, while also saving energy consumption.
The traditional titanomagnetite sintering process consumes high fuel and produces weak-strength sinter. In this study, double-layer sintering was used to solve above problems. The theoretical analysis and sintering pot test results showed that sintering of feed bed constituted by two different-basicity layers could improve mineralization and permeability. By using the double layer structure of sintering bed and controlling the basicities of lower and upper layer (2.5 and 1.5, respectively), the yield, productivity, and reduction disintegration index (RDI+3.15) were 67.32%, 1.65 t m(2) h(-1), 49.68% respectively, which were improved 33.12%, 1.74%, and 9.27%, respectively than those obtained by the traditional sintering process. Meanwhile, 1.69 kg t(-1) of solid fuel consumption and nearly 10% of electricity and gas consumption for sintering were saved. It was demonstrated that using different basicities for upper and lower layer of sintering bed would promote formation of silica-ferrite of calcium and aluminum (SFCA) with simultaneous reduction of perovskite, improving the sinter quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available