4.7 Article

Emergency department utilization in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a nationwide population-based study

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07463-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This nationwide population-based study investigated the emergency department utilization in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. The study found that 22.1% of HCM patients visited the emergency department within a one-year period, with the majority being women aged 60 and above. Cardiovascular diseases were the most common reason for emergency department visits and were associated with a higher 90-day all-cause mortality.
Despite the increasing burden of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) on healthcare resources, data on emergency department (ED) utilization in HCM are lacking. This nationwide population-based study extracted 14,542 HCM patients from the National Health Insurance Service database between 2015-2016, and investigated their ED utilization during a one-year period. The reason for ED utilization was defined as the primary diagnosis upon discharge from EDs. The clinical outcome was defined as hospitalization or all-cause mortality within 90 days after the ED visits. A total of 3209 (22.1%) HCM patients visited EDs within a one-year period (mean age, 66.8 +/- 13.8 years; male, 57.4%). The majority (71.1%) of HCM patients who visited the EDs were aged >= 60 years. The ED utilization rate was higher in women than in men (26.3% versus 19.7%, P < 0.001). Cardiovascular diseases were the most common reason for ED visits (n = 1333, 41.5%). Among HCM patients who visited EDs, 1195 (37.2%) were hospitalized, and 231 (7.2%) died within 90 days. ED visits for cardiovascular disease was associated with a higher 90-day all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval 1.79-4.12). These findings would serve as a basis for future research to establish medical policies on ED utilization in HCM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available