4.7 Article

Dimensions and forms of artefacts in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI caused by cochlear implants

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08988-2

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the impact of cochlear implants (CIs) on MRI image quality and artifacts. MRI scans were performed on a model and patients with CIs, and the resulting artifacts were compared. The study found that CIs do affect MRI image quality and cause varying artifacts depending on the sequence used.
Cochlear implantation is a standard treatment option due to expanding indications. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) has become a widespread diagnostic tool. Therefore, an increased number of cochlear implant (CI) users are undergoing cMRI scans. This study aimed to investigate the issue of the CI magnet impacting MRI quality and artifacts. 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scans with 4 defined sequences (T2-TSE, T2-TIRM, T1-3D-MPRAGE, and TDI) were performed on a phantom with a CI (SYNCHRONY System by MED-EL Austria) in place. The resulting MRI artifacts were retrospectively compared to MRI artifacts observed in patients with a CI. All images were transferred to AMIRA and visualized by manual segmentation. Usable image quality was achieved in three sequences (T2-TSE, T2-TIRM and T1-mprage). Observed artifacts differed in shape and size depending on the sequence. Maximum diameters of signal void areas ranged from 58 x 108 x 98 mm to 127 x 123 x 153 mm. Image distortions were larger. MRI artifacts caused by the SYNCHRONY system are asymmetric with varying shape, depending on the sequence. The phantom artefacts are similar to those in CI users. Considering the observed asymmetry, the hypothesis of varying implantation locations resulting in varying positions of the signal void area needs to be further investigated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available