4.7 Article

The erythrocyte membrane properties of beta thalassaemia heterozygotes and their consequences for Plasmodium falciparum invasion

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12060-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC
  2. Sackler fellowship
  3. Wellcome Trust Junior Interdisciplinary Fellowship [20485/Z/16/Z]
  4. Wellcome Trust [206194/Z/17/Z, 220266/Z/20/Z]
  5. Wellcome Trust [220266/Z/20/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the characteristics of β-thalassemic red blood cells and found that they have higher membrane tension, lower bending modulus, and higher expression levels of basigin, a major invasion receptor. These differences had opposing effects on invasion but overall did not lead to lower invasion efficiency of β-thalassemic cells by Plasmodium falciparum.
Malaria parasites such as Plasmodium falciparum have exerted formidable selective pressures on the human genome. Of the human genetic variants associated with malaria protection, beta thalassaemia (a haemoglobinopathy) was the earliest to be associated with malaria prevalence. However, the malaria protective properties of beta thalassaemic erythrocytes remain unclear. Here we studied the mechanics and surface protein expression of beta thalassaemia heterozygous erythrocytes, measured their susceptibility to P. falciparum invasion, and calculated the energy required for merozoites to invade them. We found invasion-relevant differences in beta thalassaemic cells versus matched controls, specifically: elevated membrane tension, reduced bending modulus, and higher levels of expression of the major invasion receptor basigin. However, these differences acted in opposition to each other with respect to their likely impact on invasion, and overall we did not observe beta thalassaemic cells to have lower P. falciparum invasion efficiency for any of the strains tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available