4.7 Article

A catalogue with semantic annotations makes multilabel datasets FAIR

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11316-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [J2-9230]
  2. Knowledge Technologies research programme [P2-0103]
  3. TAILOR - EU [952215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multilabel classification is a machine learning task that aims to label examples with multiple labels simultaneously. It is gaining increasing interest from the machine learning community. Ensuring proper benchmarking is crucial for further development, and this can be achieved by following data management standards such as FAIR and TRUST principles. We introduce an ontology-based online catalogue of multilabel classification datasets, providing comprehensive descriptions and information.
Multilabel classification (MLC) is a machine learning task where the goal is to learn to label an example with multiple labels simultaneously. It receives increasing interest from the machine learning community, as evidenced by the increasing number of papers and methods that appear in the literature. Hence, ensuring proper, correct, robust, and trustworthy benchmarking is of utmost importance for the further development of the field. We believe that this can be achieved by adhering to the recently emerged data management standards, such as the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) and TRUST (Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability, and Technology) principles. We introduce an ontology-based online catalogue of MLC datasets originating from various application domains following these principles. The catalogue extensively describes many MLC datasets with comprehensible meta-features, MLC-specific semantic descriptions, and different data provenance information. The MLC data catalogue is available at: http://semantichub.ijs.si/MLCdatasets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available