4.7 Article

Risk scores for predicting small for gestational age infants in Japan: The TMM birthree cohort study

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12892-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), Japan [JP20km0105001]
  2. AMED Birthday [JP21gk0110039]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP19K18659]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to predict small-for-gestational-age infants in Japan through risk scores. The study found that the risk scores during mid-gestation had a better predictive ability for small-for-gestational-age infants compared to the risk scores during early gestation.
This study aimed to construct a prediction model for small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants in Japan by creating a risk score during pregnancy. A total of 17,073 subjects were included in the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study, a prospective cohort study. A multiple logistic regression model was used to construct risk scores during early and mid-gestational periods (11-17 and 18-21 weeks of gestation, respectively). The risk score during early gestation comprised the maternal age, height, body mass index (BMI) during early gestation, parity, assisted reproductive technology (ART) with frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), smoking status, blood pressure (BP) during early gestation, and maternal birth weight. The risk score during mid-gestation also consisted of the maternal age, height, BMI during mid-gestation, weight gain, parity, ART with FET, smoking status, BP level during mid-gestation, maternal birth weight, and estimated fetal weight during mid-gestation. The C-statistics of the risk scores during early- and mid-gestation were 0.658 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.642-0.675) and 0.725 (95% CI: 0.710-0.740), respectively. In conclusion, the predictive ability of the risk scores during mid-gestation for SGA infants was acceptable and better than that of the risk score during early gestation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available