4.4 Article

Mapping winter wheat in Kaifeng, China using Sentinel-1A time-series images

Journal

REMOTE SENSING LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 503-510

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/2150704X.2022.2046888

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42101386, 61871175]
  2. Plan of Science and Technology of Kaifeng City [2102005]
  3. College Key Research Project of Henan Province [21A520004, 22A520021]
  4. Plan of Science and Technology of Henan Province [202102210175, 212102210093, 222102110439]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a winter wheat identification method combining Markov Random Field and Spectral Similarity Measure (MRF-SSM) using Sentinel-1A time-series images. The results show that the accuracy of mapping winter wheat using the MRF-SSM method is higher than using support vector machine and random forest methods, and it can accurately identify winter wheat near towns.
Crop planting area mapping is essential for crop phenology monitoring, yield prediction, and disaster prevention. In this study, a winter wheat identification method combining Markov Random Field and Spectral Similarity Measure (MRF-SSM) is proposed by using Sentinel-1 A time-series images. It is found that compared with VH polarization, the backscattering coefficient of winter wheat at VV polarization fluctuates more at all growth stages and is used for winter wheat mapping. The result shows that the precision of mapping winter wheat using the MRF-SSM is 89.62% which is higher than using the support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) methods. Because winter wheat near towns can be accurately identified using MRF-SSM methods. Moreover, the MRF-SSM method has the advantages of fewer winter wheat samples and less computation time. Therefore, time-series Sentinel-1A images with MRF-SSM have great potential for mapping winter wheat or other crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available