4.7 Article

Dietary Intake of Toxic Heavy Metals with Major Groups of Food Products-Results of Analytical Determinations

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14081626

Keywords

food; dietary intake; heavy metals; ICP-OES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the contribution of different food groups to the intake of toxic heavy metals. The results show a potential risk of nephrotoxicity from dietary intake of lead. The intake of other metals is below safety limits. Cereals and vegetables are major contributors to the intake of heavy metals, while fish is not a significant source.
Food contains a complex matrix of various substances, including essential nutrients, non-nutritive substances, and toxins, including metals. The main purpose of the study was to evaluate the contribution of major groups of food products to an overall intake of toxic heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Hg, and Ni) using a combination of the 24-dietary recall technique, the ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry) method, and chemometric tools. The obtained results reveal that there is a high potential risk of developing nephrotoxicity through the dietary intake of Pb in the case of both genders. The dietary intake determined for other elements (Cd, Hg, and Ni) was far below the limits established by European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) supported analytical determinations and revealed that cereals and vegetables were major contributors to a total intake of Cd (39.6 and 17.4% of the total exposure, respectively), Ni (40.4 and 19.3%), and Hg (16.8 and 19.6%), while water and beverages were major dietary sources of Pb (31% of the total daily intake). In contrast, eggs, fats and oils, and milk and dairy products provided the smallest amounts of Cd, Pb, and Ni. Despite containing high amounts of Hg, considering very low consumption, fish were not found to be an important source of this element.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available