4.7 Article

Low Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Sustainable Reference Diet in the Brazilian Population: Findings from the National Dietary Survey 2017-2018

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14061187

Keywords

EAT-Lancet diet; sustainable diet; diet indexes

Funding

  1. Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES) [88887.571341/2020-00]
  2. Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq) [304659/2019-3]
  3. CAPES [001]
  4. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2020/12326-1, 2019/13424-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study assessed the adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet among the Brazilian population and found low overall adherence. Women, the elderly, overweight/obese individuals, those with higher incomes, and those living in urban areas had higher scores in adherence.
Diets are simultaneously connected with population health and environment. The EAT-Lancet Commission proposed a sustainable reference diet to improve population health and respect the planetary boundaries. Recently, the Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) has been developed to assess the adherence to this reference diet. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet through the PHDI in a nationwide population-based study carried out in Brazil. We used data from the National Dietary Survey conducted through the Household Budget Survey in 2017-2018, with 46,164 Brazilians aged over 10 years old. Food consumption was evaluated with a 24 h dietary recall. The average PHDI total score in the Brazilian population was 45.9 points (95% CI 45.6:46.1) on a total score that can range from 0 to 150 points. The adherence to EAT-Lancet diet was low among all Brazilian regions. Women, elderly, those overweighed/obese, with higher per capita income and living in the urban area had higher scores in the PHDI. In general, the Brazilian population presented low adherence to a healthy and sustainable dietary pattern and seems far from meeting the EAT-Lancet recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available