4.3 Article

Calibration and Validation of HY-2 Altimeter Wave Height

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 919-936

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0219.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41276010, 41376010, U1406401]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP130100227]
  4. U.S. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0278]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hai Yang-2 (HY-2) satellite altimeter measurements of significant wave height (H-s) are analyzed over the period from 1 October 2011 to 6 December 2014. They are calibrated and validated against in situ buoys and other concurrently operating altimeters: Jason-2, CryoSat-2, and Satellite with Argos and ALtiKa (SARAL). In general, the HY-2 altimeter measurements agree well with buoy measurements, with a bias of -0.22 m and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.30 m. When the reduced major axis (RMA) regression procedure was applied to the entire period, the RMSE was reduced by 33% to 0.2 m. A further comparison with other satellite altimeters, however, revealed two additional features of HY-2 H-s estimates over this period. First, a noticeable mismatch is present between HY-2 and the other satellite altimeters for high seas (H-s > 6 m). Second, a jump increase in HY-2 H-s values was detected starting in April 2013, which was associated with the switch to backup status of the HY-2 sensors and the subsequent update of its data processing software. Although reported by previous studies, these two deficiencies had not been accounted for in calibrations. Therefore, the HY-2 wave height records are now subdivided into two phases (time periods pre- and post-April 2013) and a two-branched calibration is proposed for each phase. These revised calibrations, validated throughout the range of significant wave heights of 1-9 m, are expected to improve the practical applicability of HY-2 H-s measurements significantly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available