4.7 Review

Beyond the BMI: Validity and Practicality of Postpartum Body Composition Assessment Methods during Lactation: A Scoping Review

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14112197

Keywords

maternal nutrition; maternal body composition; anthropometry; lactation; breastfeeding

Funding

  1. Australian Government
  2. USC
  3. Agilent Technologies Top-up/Sunshine Coast Research Scholarship (USCRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The assessment of body composition during lactation is crucial for evaluating maternal nutritional status and overall health of both mother and child. Various techniques have been used to assess body composition in lactating women, but there is a need to consider issues of study design and the accuracy and reliability of measurement tools.
The assessment of body composition during lactation is an important indicator of maternal nutritional status, which is central to the overall health of the mother and child. The lactating woman's nutritional status potentially impacts on breastmilk composition and the process of lactation itself. The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize comparative studies that sought to validate various body composition assessment techniques for use in lactating women in the postpartum period. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive, systematic literature search was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Eight comparative studies were included in the review, with data from 320 postpartum women. The design methodologies varied substantially across studies, and included a range of simple techniques to advanced multi-compartment models for assessing body composition. The validity and reliability of measurement tools must be considered alongside issues of safety, practicality, and appropriateness to guide the research design when applied to lactating women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available