4.7 Article

Nanoscale limit of the thermal conductivity in crystalline silicon carbide membranes, nanowires, and phononic crystals

Journal

NPG ASIA MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41427-022-00382-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. PRESTO JST [JPMJPR19I1]
  2. CREST JST [JPMJCR19Q3]
  3. Mirai JST [JPMJMI19A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the thermal conductivity of SiC nanostructures and finds that it is lower than that in bulk materials and scales proportionally with the narrowest dimension of the structures. The observed suppression of heat conduction is linked to surface phonon scattering, which limits the phonon mean free path and reduces the thermal conductivity.
Silicon carbide (SiC) aims to be the number one material for power microelectronics due to its remarkable thermal properties. Recent progress in SiC technology finally enabled the fabrication of crystalline SiC nanostructures. Yet, the thermal properties of SiC at the nanoscale remain overlooked. Here, we systematically study heat conduction in SiC nanostructures, including nanomembranes, nanowires, and phononic crystals. Our measurements show that the thermal conductivity of nanostructures is several times lower than that in bulk and that the values scale proportionally to the narrowest dimension of the structures. In the smallest nanostructures, the thermal conductivity reached 10% of that in bulk. To better understand nanoscale thermal transport in SiC, we also probed phonon mean free path and coherent heat conduction in the nanostructures. Our theoretical model links the observed suppression of heat conduction with the surface phonon scattering, which limits the phonon mean free path and thus reduces the thermal conductivity. This work uncovers thermal characteristics of SiC nanostructures and explains their origin, thus enabling realistic thermal engineering in SiC microelectronics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available