4.6 Article

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants-A Clinical Case Series Study

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15072437

Keywords

zirconium; zirconia; ceramics; dental implants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this clinical series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 20 zirconia dental implants with a minimum follow-up of two years. The results showed that these implants achieved good integration and minimal complications in patients, suggesting that zirconia dental implants may be a favorable option for patients with favorable bone conditions.
The purpose of this clinical series was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 20 zirconia dental implants, with a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients with at least one zirconia dental implant were included, with a mean follow-up of 34.05 months. The patient complaints such as pain and foreign body sensation, as well as clinical parameters including peri-implant infections with suppuration, implant mobility, gingival index (GI), modified plaque index (mPI), modified sulcus bleeding index (mBI), probing depth (PD) and radiological distance between the implant shoulder to the closest mesial and distal bone-to-implant contact (BIC), were assessed. All zirconia implants were successfully integrated without any pain or foreign body sensation. No mobility was detected in any of the 20 implants. Clinical examination revealed a mean PD of 2.56 mm and a radiological mean distance between the implant shoulder and the initial site of visible bone-to-implant contact (BIC) of 1.44 mm. In addition, GI, mPI and mBI indicated minimal to no inflammation. Results obtained from this series suggest that one-piece zirconia dental implants achieve good clinical and radiographic outcomes over a mean follow-up of 34 months and may be deemed a good option in patients with favorable bone conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available