4.6 Article

Research on Dynamic Strength and Inertia Effect of Concrete Materials Based on Large-Diameter Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Test

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15092995

Keywords

large-diameter SHPB; high strain rate; concrete material; strain rate effect; inertia effect; dynamic strength

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52108448, 51878249]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20190806144603586]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test device is an important tool for studying the dynamic characteristics of concrete materials. Inertial effect can lead to inaccurate results in SHPB tests, so large-diameter SHPB tests were conducted and a dynamic increase factor (DIF) model considering strain rate effect and inertia effect was established. The experimental results indicate that the strain rate effect is more sensitive in concrete than in mortar, while the inertia effect is more sensitive in mortar than in concrete.
The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) test device is an important tool to study the dynamic characteristics of concrete materials. Inertial effect is one of the main factors that cause inaccurate results in SHPB tests of concrete materials. To solve this problem, Large-diameter SHPB tests on concrete and mortar were performed. A dynamic increase factor (DIF) model considering strain rate effect and inertia effect was established. This model provides a scientific reference for studying the dynamic mechanical properties of concrete materials. The experimental results indicate that the strain rate effect of concrete is more sensitive than that of mortar, but the inertia effect of mortar is more sensitive than that of concrete. Under the same strain rate, the energy utilization rate, average fragment size, and impact potentiality of mortar are higher than concrete.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available