4.6 Article

Scalable MXene and PEDOT-CNT Nanocoatings for Fibre-Reinforced Composite De-Icing

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15103535

Keywords

nanocoatings; thermal imaging; de-icing; fibre-reinforced composites; MXenes; PEDOT-CNT

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [777810]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the de-icing performance of traditional carbon fiber-based coatings with novel MXene and PEDOT-CNT nanocoatings. The nanocoatings show significantly higher average temperature increase and faster de-icing speed under the same power density, making them a promising solution for efficient de-icing of large composite structures.
In this study, the de-icing performance is investigated between traditional carbon fibre-based coatings and novel MXene and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-coated single-walled carbon nanotube (PEDOT-CNT) nanocoatings, based on simple and scalable coating application. The thickness and morphology of the coatings are investigated using atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Adhesion strength, as well as electrical properties, are evaluated on rough and glossy surfaces of the composite. The flexibility and electrical sensitivity of the coatings are studied under three-point bending. Additionally, the influence of ambient temperature on coating's electrical resistance is investigated. Finally, thermal imaging and Joule heating are analysed with high-accuracy infrared cameras. Under the same power density, the increase in average temperature is 84% higher for MXenes and 117% for PEDOT-CNT, when compared with fibre-based coatings. Furthermore, both nanocoatings result in up to three times faster de-icing. These easily processable nanocoatings offer fast and efficient de-icing for large composite structures such as wind turbine blades without adding any significant weight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available