4.2 Editorial Material

Sample size determination in method comparison and observer variability studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 1241-1243

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-022-00853-x

Keywords

Agreement; Bland-Altman analysis; Limits of Agreement; Repeatability; Reproducibility; Sample size

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article summarizes the recent developments and recommendations for comparing two quantitative measuring devices, including analysis methods and reporting guidelines in different situations.
The comparison of two quantitative measuring devices is often performed with the Limits of Agreement proposed by Bland and Altman in their seminal Lancet paper back in 1986. Sample size considerations were rare for such agreement analyses in the past, but recently several proposals have been made depending on how agreement is to be assessed and the number of replicates to be used. We have summarized recent developments and recommendations in various situations including a distinction between method comparison and observer variability studies. These include current state-of-the-art analysis of and reporting guidelines for agreement studies. General recommendations close the paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available