4.7 Article

Clinical consensus statement: Selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium 90 resin microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106094

Keywords

Asian expert consensus; Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT); Transarterial radioembolization (TARE); Yttrium 90 (Y90)

Categories

Funding

  1. Sirtex Medical, Inc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides guidance and perspectives on the use of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asia. Through a systematic literature review and consensus approach, experts developed guidelines and recommendations for the use of SIRT in HCC patients in Asia. The study also highlights the need for further clinical trials to define the role of SIRT in managing HCC among Asian populations.
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is subject to different management approaches and guidelines according to Eastern and Western therapeutic algorithms. Use of selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with resin yttrium 90 microspheres for HCC has increased in Asia in recent years, without clearly defined indications for its optimal application. The objective of this systematic review and expert consensus statement is to provide guidance and perspectives on the use of SIRT among patients with HCC in Asia. Materials and methods: A systematic literature review identified current publications on HCC management and SIRT recommendations. A group of 10 experts, representing stakeholder specialties and countries, convened between August 2020 and March 2021 and implemented a modified Delphi consensus approach to develop guidelines and indications for use of SIRT for HCC in Asia. Final recommendations were organized and adjudicated based on the level of evidence and strength of recommendation, per approaches outlined by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Results: The experts acknowledged a general lack of evidence relating to use of SIRT in Asia and identified as an unmet need the lack of phase 3 randomized trials comparing clinical outcomes and survival following SIRT versus other therapies for HCC. Through an iterative process, the expert group explored areas of clinical relevance and generated 31 guidance statements and a patient management algorithm that achieved consensus. Conclusion: These recommendations aim to support clinicians in their decision-making and to help them identify and treat patients with HCC using SIRT in Asia. The recommendations also highlight areas in which further clinical trials are needed to define the role of SIRT in management of HCC among Asian populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available