4.2 Article

Functional analysis of ATM variants in a high risk cohort provides insight into missing heritability

Journal

CANCER GENETICS
Volume 264, Issue -, Pages 40-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2022.03.003

Keywords

Cancer genetics; Cancer predisposition; ATM; Variants of unknown significance; Inherited risk

Funding

  1. The Barbara and Fred Erb Endowed Chair in Cancer Genetics
  2. Graduate School of Wayne State University, SLB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the biochemical effects of several missense mutations in the DNA repair gene ATM on ATM activity. It found that some of these mutations showed signs of reduced ATM function, indicating likely pathogenicity. These findings have important clinical implications for the diagnosis, surveillance, and outcome of hereditary cancer.
Variants of unknown significance (VUS) remain a constant challenge in the diagnosis of hereditary cancer and the counseling of patients with pedigrees suggestive of such a syndrome. In order to assess some of this limitation, several variants in the DNA repair gene ATM were selected from a cohort of high risk individuals with negative genetic diagnoses. ATM has proven a challenge in the counseling of patients due to its nature as a moderate penetrance gene. In this study, six ATM missense mutations with a high likelihood for pathogenicity were assessed through a battery of experiments to yield high fidelity infor-mation on their biochemical effect on ATM activity. We report that several of these variants show signs of reduced ATM function indicative of likely pathogenicity. With further study, this data may be used in clinic, improving diagnosis, surveillance, and outcome for patients carrying these mutations.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available