4.4 Article

Value of lymphadenectomy in patients with surgically resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Journal

BMC SURGERY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01595-y

Keywords

Lymph node metastasis; Lymphadenectomy; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U21A20374, 82141129, 82173281, 82173282, 82172577, 82172948, 81972725, 81972250, 81871950]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [21JC1401500]
  3. Scientific Innovation Project of Shanghai Education Committee [2019-01-07-00-07-E00057]
  4. Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center [SHDC2020CR1006A]
  5. Xuhui District Artificial Intelligence Medical Hospital Cooperation Project [2021-011]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission [20ZR1471100, 19QA1402100]
  7. Commission of Health and Family Planning [2018YQ06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that lymph node metastasis (LNM) is associated with poorer prognosis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET), but only in grade 2/3 tumors is there a significant correlation. Additionally, tumor grade and size appear to be independent predictors of LNM. Therefore, regional lymphadenectomy should be performed in grade 2/3 tumors, while functional sparing surgery or clinical monitoring may be considered for grade 1 tumors.
Background Although some factors that predict the prognosis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) have been confirmed, the predictive value of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the prognosis of pNETs remains conflicting and it is not clear whether regional lymphadenectomy should be performed in all grades of tumors. Methods We included pNET patients undergoing surgery in Shanghai pancreatic cancer institute (SHPCI). The risk factors for survival were investigated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. We evaluated the predictors of LNM using Logistic regression. Results For 206 patients in the SHPCI series, LNM was an independent prognostic factor for entire cohort suggested by multivariate Cox regression analysis. LNM (P = 0.002) predicted poorer overall survival (OS) in grade 2/3 cohort, but there is no significant association between LNM and OS in grade 1 cohort. Grade (P < 0.001) and size (P = 0.049) predicted LNM in entire cohort. Grade (P = 0.002) predicted LNM while regardless of size in grade 2/3 cohort. Conclusions Based on our own retrospective data obtained from a single center series, LNM seems to be associated with poorer outcome for patients with grade 2/3 and/or grade 1 > 4 cm tumors. On the other way, LNM was seems to be not associated with prognosis in patients with grade 1 tumors less than 4 cm. Moreover, tumor grade and tumor size seem to act as independent predictors of LNM. Thus, regional lymphadenectomy should be performed in grade 2/3 patients but was not mandatory in grade 1 tumors < 4 cm. It is reasonable to perform functional sparing surgery for grade 1 patients or propose a clinical-radiological monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available