4.5 Article

Should pregnant women know their individual risk of future pelvic floor dysfunction? A qualitative study

Journal

BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04490-9

Keywords

Pelvic floor dysfunction; Urinary incontinence; Faecal incontinence; Pelvic organ prolapse; Risk; Maternity care

Funding

  1. Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government [CGA/18/39]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to explore the perspectives of pregnant women and healthcare professionals on individual risk scores for future Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD), the feasibility of providing this during routine maternity care, and the actions women might take as a result of knowing their PFD risk. The findings showed that women had limited knowledge about PFD but believed it was important to know their individual risk and that the knowledge would motivate them to take preventative activities. Healthcare professionals also believed it was important to discuss PFD risk, but time constraints and concerns over increased caesarean section rates limited these discussions.
Background The study aimed to explore: center dot pregnant women's and healthcare professionals' perspectives on provision of individual risk scores for future Pelvic Floor Dysfunction (PFD), center dot the feasibility of providing this during routine maternity care, center dot actions women might take as a result of knowing their PFD risk. Methods Qualitative study. Setting: UK NHS Health Board. Participants: Pregnant women (n = 14), obstetricians (n = 6), midwives (n = 8) and physiotherapists (n = 3). A purposive sample of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals were introduced to the UR-CHOICE calculator, which estimates a woman's PFD risk, and were shown examples of low, medium and high-risk women. Data were collected in 2019 by semi-structured interview and focus group and analysed using the Framework Approach. Results Women's PFD knowledge was limited, meaning they were unlikely to raise PFD risk with healthcare professionals. Women believed it was important to know their individual PFD risk and that knowledge would motivate them to undertake preventative activities. Healthcare professionals believed it was important to discuss PFD risk, however limited time and concerns over increased caesarean section rates prevented this in all but high-risk women or those that expressed concerns. Conclusion Women want to know their PFD risk. As part of an intervention based within a pregnant woman/ maternity healthcare professional consultation, the UR-CHOICE calculator could support discussion to consider preventative PFD activities and to enable women to be more prepared should PFD occur. A randomised controlled trial is needed to test the effectiveness of an intervention which includes the UR-CHOICE calculator in reducing PFD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available