4.6 Article

In vivo assessment of corneal biomechanics under a localized cross-linking treatment using confocal air-coupled optical coherence elastography

Journal

BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 2644-2654

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/BOE.456186

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30EY07551, R01EY022362]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Utilizing ACUS-OCE technology, this study explored the local changes of corneal elasticity in untreated, half-CXL-treated, and full-CXL-treated rabbit corneas, revealing significant increases in shear modulus in the treated regions. This indicates the potential of ACUS-OCE technology in detecting spatially-dependent mechanical properties of the cornea.
The localized application of the riboflavin/UV-A collagen cross-linking (UV-CXL) corneal treatment has been proposed to concentrate the stiffening process only in the compromised regions of the cornea by limiting the epithelium removal and irradiation area. However, current clinical screening devices dedicated to measuring corneal biomechanics cannot provide maps nor spatial-dependent changes of elasticity in corneas when treated locally with UV-CXL. In this study, we leverage our previously reported confocal air-coupled ultrasonic optical coherence elastography (ACUS-OCE) probe to study local changes of corneal elasticity in three cases: untreated, half-CXL-treated, and full-CXL-treated in vivo rabbit corneas (n = 8). We found a significant increase of the shear modulus in the half-treated (>450%) and full-treated (>650%) corneal regions when compared to the non-treated cases. Therefore, the ACUS-OCE technology possesses a great potential in detecting spatially-dependent mechanical properties of the cornea at multiple meridians and generating elastography maps that are clinically relevant for patient-specific treatment planning and monitoring of UV-CXL procedures. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available