4.8 Article

Ultrahigh strength and shear-assisted separation of sliding nanocontacts studied in situ

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30290-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japanese society for the promotion of science
  2. NSK foundation for advancement of mechatronics
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA2386-18-1-4083]
  4. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1761874, CMMI-1854702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the behavior of crystalline silver nanocontacts under combined tension and shear was investigated using custom microfabricated devices and ultrahigh vacuum transmission electron microscopy. The results showed limited plastic deformation and lower pull-off forces than predicted, indicating the high strength and defect-free nature of the nanocontacts.
The behavior of materials in sliding contact is challenging to determine since the interface is normally hidden from view. Using a custom microfabricated device, we conduct in situ, ultrahigh vacuum transmission electron microscope measurements of crystalline silver nanocontacts under combined tension and shear, permitting simultaneous observation of contact forces and contact width. While silver classically exhibits substantial sliding-induced plastic junction growth, the nanocontacts exhibit only limited plastic deformation despite high applied stresses. This difference arises from the nanocontacts' high strength, as we find the von Mises stresses at yield points approach the ideal strength of silver. We attribute this to the nanocontacts' nearly defect-free nature and small size. The contacts also separate unstably, with pull-off forces well below classical predictions for rupture under pure tension. This strongly indicates that shearing reduces nanoscale pull-off forces, predicted theoretically at the continuum level, but not directly observed before.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available