4.8 Article

Spelling interface using intracortical signals in a completely locked-in patient enabled via auditory neurofeedback training

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28859-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering, Geneva
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG BI 195/77-1]
  3. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [16SV7701]
  4. LUMINOUSH2020-FETOPEN-2014-2015-RIA [686764]
  5. Bogenhausen Staedtische Klinik, Munich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that ALS patients in a completely locked-in state can still communicate through neural-based control, indicating that they might be able to achieve independent communication through the brain.
Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) can lose all muscle-based routes of communication as motor neuron degeneration progresses, and ultimately, they may be left without any means of communication. While others have evaluated communication in people with remaining muscle control, to the best of our knowledge, it is not known whether neural-based communication remains possible in a completely locked-in state. Here, we implanted two 64 microelectrode arrays in the supplementary and primary motor cortex of a patient in a completely locked-in state with ALS. The patient modulated neural firing rates based on auditory feedback and he used this strategy to select letters one at a time to form words and phrases to communicate his needs and experiences. This case study provides evidence that brain-based volitional communication is possible even in a completely locked-in state. The authors record neural firing rates in a patient with ALS in completely locked-in state and show that the patient can modulate neural firing rates based on auditory feedback to select letters to form words and phrases to communicate his needs and experiences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available