4.8 Article

Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Natural Science [VR-2016-06301]
  2. Swedish E-science Research Center
  3. Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing [SNIC 2021/5-297, SNIC 2021/6-197, Berzelius-2021-29]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2016-06301] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predicting the structure of protein complexes is extremely challenging. In this study, the authors utilize AlphaFold2 combined with optimized multiple sequence alignments to model interacting protein complexes, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy in predicting both the interaction status and mode of proteins.
Predicting the structure of interacting protein chains is a fundamental step towards understanding protein function. Unfortunately, no computational method can produce accurate structures of protein complexes. AlphaFold2, has shown unprecedented levels of accuracy in modelling single chain protein structures. Here, we apply AlphaFold2 for the prediction of heterodimeric protein complexes. We find that the AlphaFold2 protocol together with optimised multiple sequence alignments, generate models with acceptable quality (DockQ >= 0.23) for 63% of the dimers. From the predicted interfaces we create a simple function to predict the DockQ score which distinguishes acceptable from incorrect models as well as interacting from non-interacting proteins with state-of-art accuracy. We find that, using the predicted DockQ scores, we can identify 51% of all interacting pairs at 1% FPR. Predicting the structure of protein complexes is extremely difficult. Here, authors apply AlphaFold2 with optimized multiple sequence alignments to model complexes of interacting proteins, enabling prediction of both if and how proteins interact with state-of-art accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available