4.8 Article

Constraining composition and temperature variations in the mantle transition zone

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28709-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [NSF-EAR-1664471, NSF-EAR-1555388, NSF-EAR-1829273, NSF-EAR-1847707]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mantle transition zone, connecting the upper mantle and lower mantle, has been studied to investigate its physical properties and global distribution. The study found that the areas near subducted slabs in the upper mantle transition zone are relatively cold, enriched in wadsleyite, and slightly more hydrated compared to regions where plumes are expected.
The mantle transition zone connects two major layers of Earth's interior that may be compositionally distinct: the upper mantle and the lower mantle. Wadsleyite is a major mineral in the upper mantle transition zone. Here, we measure the single-crystal elastic properties of hydrous Fe-bearing wadsleyite at high pressure-temperature conditions by Brillouin spectroscopy. Our results are then used to model the global distribution of wadsleyite proportion, temperature, and water content in the upper mantle transition zone by integrating mineral physics data with global seismic observations. Our models show that the upper mantle transition zone near subducted slabs is relatively cold, enriched in wadsleyite, and slightly more hydrated compared to regions where plumes are expected. This study provides direct evidence for the thermochemical heterogeneities in the upper mantle transition zone which is important for understanding the material exchange processes between the upper and lower mantle. A new study by @JinZhang_MP models the global distribution of wadsleyite proportion, temperature and water content in the upper mantle transition zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available