4.4 Review

Role of STK11 in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

ONCOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13301

Keywords

non-small cell lung cancer; anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive; STK11; drug resistance; targeted therapies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ALK inhibitors have shown efficacy in treating ALK-positive NSCLC, but resistance development remains a challenge. The high cost of targeted inhibitors and potential for increased resistance to combination therapy are important issues to address. STK11 mutation may serve as a biomarker for immunotherapy in NSCLC. This review summarizes the role of STK11 in ALK-positive NSCLC and provides an overview of treatment and drug resistance studies.
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors have been shown to be effective in treating patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and crizotinib, ceritinib and alectinib have been approved as clinical first-line therapeutic agents. The availability of these inhibitors has also largely changed the treatment strategy for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. However, patients still inevitably develop resistance to ALK inhibitors, leading to tumor recurrence or metastasis. The most critical issues that need to be addressed in the current treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC include the high cost of targeted inhibitors and the potential for increased toxicity and resistance to combination therapy. Recently, it has been suggested that the serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11) mutation may serve as one of the biomarkers for immunotherapy in NSCLC. Therefore, the main purpose of this review was to summarize the role of STK11 in ALK-positive NSCLC. The present review also summarizes the treatment and drug resistance studies in ALK-positive NSCLC and the current status of STK11 research in NSCLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available